Skip to content
F~Robotics

Towards autonomous sensor and actuator model induction on a mobile robot

The Combine·5h ago·2 views
Authors: Daniel Stronger, Peter StoneField: Connection ScienceYear: 2006DOI: 10.1080/09540090600768690 27 citations

This article presents a novel methodology for a robot to autonomously induce models of its actions and sensors called ASAMI (autonomous sensor and actuator model induction). While previous approaches to model learning rely on an independent source of training data, we show how a robot can induce action and sensor models without any well-calibrated feedback. Specifically, the only inputs to the ASAMI learning process are the data the robot would naturally have access to: its raw sensations and knowledge of its own action selections. From the perspective of developmental robotics, our robot’s goal is to obtain self-consistent internal models, rather than to perform any externally defined tasks. Furthermore, the target function of each model-learning process comes from within the system, namely the most current version of another internal system model. Concretely realizing this model-learning methodology presents a number of challenges, and we introduce a broad class of settings in which solutions to these challenges are presented. ASAMI is fully implemented and tested, and empirical results validate our approach in a robotic testbed domain using a Sony Aibo ERS-7 robot.

View external link ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Score: 0

Related papers

Sharing this paper's topic and concept tags, via OpenAlex. These aren't in Graze — they link straight out to the source.

  • Simultaneous Calibration of Action and Sensor Models on a Mobile Robot

    Daniel Stronger, Peggy Fidelman and Peter Stone · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · 2006

  • Maximum likelihood estimation of sensor and action model functions on a mobile robot

    Daniel Stronger, PETER R. STONE · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · 2008

0 Comments

The summary above is machine-written and the abstract is the authors' own pitch. This is where people who read the paper say what it actually found, what the summary missed, and which part is worth your time.

Log in to join the discussion.