Skip to content
F~MembraneSeparationAndGas

Pressure and Cross-Flow Dependent Interfacial Fouling of Mesoporous PES-PUMA Membranes During Water-in-Oil Emulsion Separation

The Combine·3h ago·1 view
Authors: Bahramian A, Alavinia SField: MembranesYear: 2026DOI: 10.3390/membranes16100350

Water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion treatment is challenging because efficient membrane separation requires simultaneous control of oil transport, water rejection, interfacial interactions, and fouling resistance. However, the coupled effects of operating pressure and cross-flow hydrodynamics on membrane pore accessibility, foulant-layer evolution, and the permeability-rejection trade-off during cyclic W/O emulsion treatment remain insufficiently understood. In this study, an electrospun mesoporous polyurethane-melamine/polyethersulfone (PES-PUMA) membrane was evaluated for the separation of stabilized W/O emulsions under different operating pressures and feed flow rates. At an ultra-low pressure of 20 kPa, the membrane achieved an oil permeate flux of 36.5 ± 2.7 L m-2 h-1 and water rejection of 93.1 ± 2.1%. Increasing the operating pressure to 100 kPa increased the oil permeate flux to 87.6 ± 3.5 L m-2 h-1 while decreasing water rejection to 78.2 ± 1.8%. Increasing the cross-flow rate from 0.05 to 0.5 mL s-1 increased the oil permeate flux from 23.4 ± 0.7 to 90.7 ± 2.1 L m-2 h-1 while decreasing water rejection from 95.3 ± 2.1% to 78.4 ± 1.2%. Quadratic regression models revealed significant nonlinear relationships between hydraulic operating conditions and both separation responses, providing a quantitative description of the pressure- and flow-dependent performance trade-off. Higher cross-flow reduced foulant-layer thickness and favored more reversible fouling, whereas increasing operating pressure promoted pore constriction and compact foulant deposition. These findings establish a quantitative pressure-cross-flow-transport-fouling relationship, demonstrating that hydraulic conditions jointly regulate membrane permeability, water rejection, foulant-layer development, and fouling reversibility. This study therefore provides mechanistic and quantitative insight into optimizing the operation of the established PES-PUMA membrane to balance separation performance and fouling…

View external link ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Score: 0

0 Comments

The summary above is machine-written and the abstract is the authors' own pitch. This is where people who read the paper say what it actually found, what the summary missed, and which part is worth your time.

Log in to join the discussion.