Skip to content
F~CarbonCaptureAndGeologic

A State-of-the-Art Review on Technology for Carbon Utilization and Storage

The Combine·17h ago·1 view
Authors: Yafei Zhao, Ken-ichi ItakuraField: EnergiesYear: 2023DOI: 10.3390/en16103992 44 citations

Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technologies are regarded as an economically feasible way to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, various aspects of CCUS are reviewed and discussed, including the use of geological sequestration, ocean sequestration and various mineral carbon mineralization with its accelerated carbonization methods. By chemically reacting CO2 with calcium or magnesium-containing minerals, mineral carbonation technology creates stable carbonate compounds that do not require ongoing liability or monitoring. In addition, using industrial waste residues as a source of carbonate minerals appears as an option because they are less expensive and easily accessible close to CO2 emitters and have higher reactivity than natural minerals. Among those geological formations for CO2 storage, carbon microbubbles sequestration provides the economic leak-free option of carbon capture and storage. This paper first presents the advantages and disadvantages of various ways of storing carbon dioxide; then, it proposes a new method of injecting carbon dioxide and industrial waste into underground cavities.

View external link ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Score: 0

Related papers

Sharing this paper's topic and concept tags, via OpenAlex. These aren't in Graze — they link straight out to the source.

  • Experimental Investigation of Concrete Carbonation under Different Conditions

    Nhiu Zhiguon, Y.-S. Ri · Civil Engineering and Architecture · 2013

  • Carbonation Resistance of Concrete Containing Mg(OH)2 as a Carbon Immobilizer

    Wei Chen, Xiaoxing Chen, Peiliang Shen · 2012

  • Experimental Research on Accelerated Carbonation of Concrete under Low CO_2 Concentration

    Zhang Ya-me · China Concrete and Cement Products · 2010

0 Comments

The summary above is machine-written and the abstract is the authors' own pitch. This is where people who read the paper say what it actually found, what the summary missed, and which part is worth your time.

Log in to join the discussion.