Skip to content
F~TotallyReal

Sidearm Deliveries Are Associated With Lower Shoulder and Elbow Injury Burden and a Favorable Performance Profile in Major League Baseball: A Cohort Study of 927 Pitchers (2020-2025)

The Combine·13d ago·4 views
Authors: Dillon MR, Mastroianni MA, Frappa N, Manzi J, Fuller SI, Curtis W, Alexander FJ, Ablove R, Chalmers PN, Ahmad CSField: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicineYear: 2026DOI: 10.1177/23259671261470537

Sidearm Deliveries Are Associated With Lower Shoulder and Elbow Injury Burden and a Favorable Performance Profile in Major League Baseball: A Cohort Study of 927 Pitchers (2020-2025). Dillon MR(1), Mastroianni MA(2), Frappa N(1), Manzi J(3), Fuller SI(4), Curtis W(2), Alexander FJ(2), Ablove R(4), Chalmers PN(5), Ahmad CS(2). BACKGROUND: Pitching-related shoulder and elbow injuries continue to rise in baseball despite workload restrictions and biomechanics-informed coaching. PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between arm slot and shoulder/elbow injured list (IL) time-loss burden and performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Publicly available data were aggregated for 927 MLB pitchers who threw ≥1000 pitches during 2020 to 2025 and had arm angle data available from the MLB Hawk-Eye tracking system. Arm slot was defined as the throwing-arm angle relative to horizontal at ball release and averaged per pitcher (mean ± SD, 39.0°± 10.9°). Based on the distribution of arm slot values in the cohort, pitchers were categorized as sidearm (<33.5°; n = 255), three-quarters (33.5°-44.4°; n = 373), or overhand (>44.4°; n = 299). Primary outcomes were cumulative shoulder+elbow, shoulder, and elbow IL days accrued during the 2020 to 2025 study period. Performance outcomes included run prevention metrics, FanGraphs "plus" metrics (Stuff+ reflects pitch quality indexed to league average), strikeout and walk rates, hard-hit percentage (frequency of high-exit-velocity contact), and expected fielding independent pitching (xFIP; pitcher-controlled run prevention estimate). Group comparisons used 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey testing. Continuous associations with performance metrics reaching group-level significance were assessed with linear regression. Injury burden was modeled using negative binomial regression with log (total pitches) and percentage of games started as covariates; the primary analysis addition…

View external link ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Score: 0

0 Comments

The summary above is machine-written and the abstract is the authors' own pitch. This is where people who read the paper say what it actually found, what the summary missed, and which part is worth your time.

Log in to join the discussion.